Voter Rolls Show Major Errors Across Multiple States


Listen To Story Above

Voter roll irregularities across America reveal a concerning pattern of anomalies, with states showing inaccuracy rates between 7% and 20%. This insight comes from analyzing the world’s largest election database, containing 2.7 billion records across more than 20 state voter rolls.

The irregularities manifest in various ways. Some registered voters appear at commercial locations like Walmart stores and gas stations. Others, like Phineas, continue receiving mail-in ballots despite submitting change of address forms. In apartment complexes, missing unit numbers lead to undeliverable ballots, which sometimes end up in the hands of political operatives who receive compensation from NGOs – organizations often funded through federal channels.

More peculiar cases include Martha, who has been voting absentee for 18 years from a fraternity house in Mississippi. These discrepancies often go undetected by voter integrity organizations due to their inability to monitor voter rolls in real-time or cross-reference them with property tax records.

The current voter roll system’s single-dimension structure presents significant limitations. For instance, while it might show 11 registered voters at 459 Tremont Street, it fails to reveal that this address is actually an abandoned coffee shop in a condemned strip mall scheduled for demolition.

The existing voter integrity movement lacks the technological capabilities to identify these anomalies effectively, leading to repetitive discussions about unclean voter rolls without implementing practical solutions.

To address these issues permanently, state organizations should implement four key strategies without relying on government support. First, obtain regular voter roll updates and cross-reference them with property tax records to identify suspicious registrations. Second, employ time series analysis to detect temporal fraud, particularly focusing on long-term registrations at temporary housing facilities.

Third, conduct weekly comparisons between voter rolls and NCOA change of address records to identify undeliverable ballot addresses. Fourth, monitor for sovereign fraud, similar to the 2022 Arizona case where 22,000 new voters were added just before the election.

This approach proved effective in Wisconsin during 2024, where teams prevented over 60,000 potentially fraudulent mail-in ballots from ineligible addresses. Despite this success, resource limitations impacted broader election outcomes.

The RNC’s focus on get-out-the-vote campaigns, while investing significantly, yielded minimal results. They notably declined to address the issue of mail-in ballots from ineligible locations, which predominantly favor left-leaning voters. This approach contributed to Republican losses in several crucial Senate races in 2024, affecting the current composition of Senate leadership.

Previous articlePyrotechnics spark deadly nightclub fire, killing 59 people
Next articleJudge orders Trump to rehire fired federal workers