The following story is brought to you courtesy of PJ Media. Click the link to visit their page and see more stories.
In the wee hours of Saturday morning, the House of Representatives passed the $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief bill. Last week, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) editorial board dissected the spending in the bill, reporting that less than 10 percent of the funds would directly address the COVID-19 pandemic.
The bill passed 219-212, with every Republican voting against it and all but two Democrats voting for it, Politico reported.
“It’s not well thought through, not a lot of amendments were approved or allowed,” Rep. Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.), one of the Democrats who voted against it, explained earlier this week. “I came here to legislate and I’m not being allowed to do that.” Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine) also voted against the bill.
House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) said leaders of his caucus “worked overtime” to ensure every Republican voted against the bill.
“It says a lot about GOP unity, that on something big like this, when President Biden and Nancy Pelosi shut Republicans out of the process, we will stick together,” Scalise said.
Democrats had originally included a gradual increase in the federal minimum wage, bringing it up to $15/hour by 2025, but the Senate parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, said Senate rules require the removal of the minimum wage hike. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is reportedly considering adding a provision in the Senate bill that would penalize large companies that don’t pay workers at least $15/hour.
What does the minimum wage have to do with COVID-19 relief? Come to think of it, how much of the bill involves non-COVID-related spending?
The bill includes $75 billion for vaccines, treatments, testing, and medical supplies. It also includes $19 billion for “public health,” primarily for state health departments and community health centers. A generous reckoning would even include the $6 billion to the Indian Health Service and the $4 billion for mental health in this category.
The bill also includes $7.2 billion for the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), $15 billion for economic injury disaster loans, $26 billion for restaurants, bars, and live venues struggling with the lockdowns, and $15 billion in payroll support for airlines. In order to receive this money, businesses will have to prove they suffered economic harm from the pandemic, and in some cases, they will have to repay loans.
The bill will also send $1,400 in individual checks that phases out at $75,000 individual income — a cost of $413 billion overall. The bill will also extend the $400/week “enhanced” unemployment benefits from previous bills through August 2021. The Congressional Budget Office put the cost of this unemployment bonus at $246 billion, warning that it “could increase the unemployment rate as well as decrease labor force participation.”
Even this generous definition of COVID-related spending only adds up to $825 billion or 43.4 percent of the total. House Republicans zeroed in on the fact that a mere $164 billion (8.6 percent) goes toward directly fighting the pandemic.
So what accounts for the other trillion-plus in spending?
For starters, the COVID-19 “relief” bill bails out state and local governments to the tune of $350 billion, even though state revenues have largely recovered since the spring. Democrats changed the funding formula to ensure that most of the dollars go to blue states that imposed strict lockdowns. While the CARES Act distributed money by state population, the $220 billion for states in the new bill will be allocated based on average unemployment over the three-month period ending in December.
New York (8.2 percent unemployment in December) and California (9 percent), notorious for strict lockdowns, will reap benefits for crushing businesses, while South Dakota (3 percent unemployment in December) will face penalties for remaining open.
The bill also includes $86 billion to rescue about 185 multi-employer pension plans insured by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. These plans are chronically underfunded due to lax federal standards and accounting rules, yet the bailout comes with no real reform.
The bill directs $129 billion to elementary and secondary schools, regardless of whether or not they reopen. It sends another $40 billion to higher education. Congress has already provided about $113 billion for schools and most of those funds remain to be spent, so the CBO projects that schools will spend 95 percent of these new funds between 2022 and 2028, after the pandemic is over.
The bill includes $35 billion for subsidies to defray Obamacare premiums and $15 billion for a temporary five-percentage-point increase in the federal Medicaid match to states that expand eligibility to lower-income adults. The WSJ editorial board argued that this provision aims “to chip away at private coverage on the way to Medicare for All.”
The bill includes $39 billion for child care, $30 billion for public transit, $19 billion in rental assistance, $10 billion in mortgage help, $4.5 billion for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance program, $3.5 billion for food stamps, $1 billion for Head Start, $1.5 billion for Amtrak, $50 billion for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, $4 billion to pay off the loans of “socially disadvantaged” farmers and ranchers, and nearly $1 billion in global food assistance.
The bill increases the child tax credit from $2,000 to $3,000 (a cost of $99 billion) and expands the Earned Income Tax Credit to some childless adults ($25 billion).
Finally, the bill includes pork-barrell spending, pet causes for specific members. Congress would spend $1.5 million for the Seaway International Bridge, a priority for Schumer. The bridge connects New York to Canada — a country that still prevents those supposedly COVID-prone Americans from entering. The bill also includes nearly $500 million for “grants to fund activities related to the arts, humanities, libraries and museums, and Native American language preservation.”
No wonder Schrader and Golden voted against this blue bailout. If only other Democrats had joined them.
Of course, this opportunism was nothing new from Democrats. Back in March 2020, Democrats suddenly blocked a COVID-19 relief bill — after a bipartisan team of then-Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), and then-Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) had worked out numerous compromises to rush the legislation.
Rather than working to pass the bipartisan bill, Senate Democrats blocked the effort and House Democrats presented Pelosi’s version, a bill jam-packed with pet projects like a slate of liberal election “reforms,” a $15/hour minimum wage, Green New Deal standards forcing airlines to report the carbon emissions for each flight, collective bargaining for unions, and more.
House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) told lawmakers, “This is a tremendous opportunity to restructure things to fit our vision,” echoing former Obama Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, who notoriously said, “You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it’s an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”